Is CSS still worth it? That's the question columnist Hussain H Zaidi asked in The News on 4th May 2026, and it's worth taking seriously. Pass rates have sat below 3% for several years running despite no change to the exam format. His argument: the drop isn't really about falling education standards. It's about the civil service losing prestige relative to everything else a bright graduate could choose instead. Here's his case, and the other side of it.
The News's argument: prestige, not difficulty, explains the decline
Zaidi's starting point is simple game theory. A contest gets fierce competition when the prize is seen as worth fighting for, and it draws less effort when the payoff looks weak next to comparable options. He argues CSS's payoff, a lifelong civil service career, has lost value relative to what else is now on the table for Pakistan's brightest graduates.
He draws on Max Weber's description of bureaucracy as "legal-rational authority": bound by law, run on evidence, resistant to bias. That same structure, he argues, also breeds excessive formalism and slow decision-making, especially under Pakistan's tall organisational hierarchy, at a time when speed and adaptability matter more than ever.
Is CSS still worth it? Weighing both sides
Strip the argument down to its core claims and set them against the reasons the exam still draws thousands of serious applicants every year.
- Structural security: even with the tenure concerns Zaidi raises, a civil service career still offers more predictability than most private-sector paths in Pakistan's economy.
- Breadth of influence: few private-sector roles offer the same range of postings, departments, and direct involvement in public policy that CSS careers provide.
- Local social standing: outside major cities especially, a civil service posting still commands real respect and access that private income alone doesn't always buy.
- 12,792 still applied: whatever the prestige trend, the exam remains competitive enough to draw a large, serious applicant pool every cycle.
- Shrinking authority: privatisation and a reduced state role mean less real power comes attached to the position than a generation ago.
- Pay gap widened: private-sector and overseas opportunities now often outpay a civil service career by a wide margin, especially for top academic performers.
- Politicisation: loyalty to political patrons increasingly outweighs loyalty to institutional process, which erodes the professional independence the job was built on.
- Insecure tenure: a single misstep, fair or engineered, can end a career outright, a risk profile top talent has less reason to accept when better-paying alternatives exist.
A number worth double-checking
Zaidi's column states 172 candidates were recommended for appointment out of the 342 who qualified. FPSC's own official Annex-A for CSS-2025, published 30th April 2026, puts that figure at 170 (84 male, 86 female). The gap is small and doesn't change the underlying argument, but it's worth flagging since it shows even careful commentary can drift slightly from the source document. For the full verified breakdown, see our CSS 2025 Result & Pass Rate Analysis.
What this means if you're preparing for CSS right now
None of this changes the mechanics of preparing for the exam. But it's a useful frame for a decision every serious aspirant eventually has to make: are you drawn to CSS for the authority and structure it still offers, or mainly for its historical prestige? Zaidi's argument suggests the second motivation is weakening faster than the first. Worth sitting with before you commit years of preparation to it.
Frequently asked questions
Why does The News argue CSS is losing its appeal?
The column argues that a shrinking state role, wealth replacing authority as the main marker of status, growing politicisation, and insecure tenure have together reduced the civil service's relative prestige, not that the exam itself has grown harder.
How long has the CSS pass rate stayed below 3%?
According to the column, qualified candidates have stayed under 3% of those who appeared for several consecutive years, with CSS-2025 landing at 2.67%.
Is this a factual report or an opinion piece?
It's opinion commentary published in The News's Opinion section. The pass-rate figures it cites are factual and match FPSC's official results, with one minor discrepancy in the recommended-appointment figure.
Does a declining pass rate always mean declining prestige?
Not necessarily on its own. This piece treats the prestige argument as one plausible explanation among several, alongside possibilities like tougher marking or wider access to alternative careers, rather than a settled conclusion.
References
- The News: "Is CSS no longer worth it?" by Hussain H Zaidi, published 4 May 2026.
- FPSC Annex-A: Announcement of Final Result, CSS-2025, No. F.2/4/2026-CE, 30 April 2026.
- CSS Bureau: CSS 2025 Result & Pass Rate Full Analysis